The Recipe for Making Bud Wiser [Branding, Part I]

Forward to Marlboro Man; You’ve Come a Long Way Baby [Part II] >>

Intelligence and Wisdom are not same thing. Intelligence is a cerebral academic exercise. Wisdom is a practical predictive strategy to a goal. Of course, wisdom uses some degree of academic intelligence as a tool, but wisdom remains a practical science. We know that there is never a foolish sage, but there are a lot of intelligent fools.

It has been said that intelligence is knowing how to shoot a gun, and wisdom is knowing when to shoot it.

By now, you’ve heard of the Bud Light marketing debacle, costing self-proclaimed “King [XY]-of-Beers” Anheuser-Bush billions in sales by its boycotting former customers, mostly men (XYs). The marketing debacle occurred in the decision of the Bud Light team to use a transgender person (XY) as a beer can image and representative spokesperson.

We respect the legal rights and personal preferences of unique individuals in a diverse, free and free-thinking society, but this was a foolish marketing decision.

I’ve worked with some brilliant women (XXs) and men (XYs) for more than 35 years as IP legal counsel with branding issues and registering trademarks—personally successfully filing more than 500 applications—learning some things about branding and marketing along the way. And I’ve earned the right to teach numerous classes to attorneys and business professionals.

I will summarize facts of this particular Bud Light marketing debacle:

A Harvard graduate was newly placed in charge of the Bud Light marketing. So far as the evidence suggests, the person in charge happened to be a woman (XX). As a matter of tendencies, we can fairly say that no one gets into Harvard or graduates from Harvard without being intelligent. Therefore, we can say that this woman who was newly placed in charge of the Bud Light advertising was intelligent, and, as a matter of statistical tendencies, highly intelligent.

Now, as I mentioned above, the person placed in charge was a woman. Yes, yes, yes, I just said that, notwithstanding that current culture and social correctness suggest that I should make that fact an irrelevancy.

And therein lies exactly the issue at hand for the application of wisdom.

The world is getting more foolish (and more angry) because it is increasingly trying to repress natural truth to the point of social dysfunction. This is why the pursuit of happiness is actually now making people more and more angry.

Here is the truth: Men (XYs) do foolish things all the time. And many times, men do foolish things simply because men tend to act like men. But, lo and behold, women (XXs) do foolish things all the time, too. [1.1] And many times woman do foolish things simply because women tend to act like women. It is neither discriminatorily derogatory nor prejudiced to say that these types of respective human beings so-named have distinct cause and effect DNA attributes by the grace of god or simply by the necessities of evolution. As a general rule, respective body parts are relevant evidence to support the point.

There are two major culprits that steer intelligence away from wisdom: Emotion and Hope (with some authority that Hope is itself an emotion). [1.2, 2, 3, 4] Indeed, wisdom neither allows the intrusion of emotion nor does it rely upon hope. If I’ve said it once or a million times, “Hope will mess you up.” I will explain.

Legal rights and related minority rights are one thing, but marketing strategy is something else. They may be correlated, but they are different things. The general rule distinction between law and marketing is as basic as male-female opposites:

Force versus Seduction. Law is force. Marketing is seduction.

By force of law, it is illegal to discriminate against minorities (race, color, creed, gender, etc.) in hiring, pay, etc., as it absolutely should be. But, at least for now, effective marketing is to extract and to target those very same attributes to seduce a potential buyer into a voluntary purchase within a competitive environment where other choices are available.

At least for now—although perhaps soon to be gone—the law permits target marketing based upon exactly the same attributes that are otherwise discriminatory for hiring or other purposes.

Law is a push by force, marketing is a pull by seduction. Conflating them is foolish. Conflating them with emotion or hope is even more foolish. And most of all, thinking that we can achieve brand loyalty by force rather than seduction is exponentially foolishness-squared.

I’ll paraphrase the back-room conflation that is likely to have occurred in the Bud Light thought-process by the highly intelligent Harvard-graduate marketing team:

“Demographic tendencies evidence that these Bud Light Boomers are old and dying off. They have old-school ancient social viewpoints, and the future is inclusion and acceptance. They are adult puerile man-boys who do juvenile fraternity Animal House-like nonsensical dumb-stuff acts. For not a lot of money, we can pay this young representative transgender influencer as a representative spokesperson getting direct access into all those new potential customers who need to see our Bud Light brand as supportive of that social preference. This is what society should be anyway. Inclusive and fair, which Bud Light supports.”

All that is pretty much by the book, academically. But, if we should see it, it dysfunctionally denies the reality of necessary marketing seduction. It presupposes with emotion and hope what society and the Bud Light customers could or should be, rather than what they actually are. Indeed, perhaps it implies the hopeful softer homogenization of gender, denying a polarized hard male-centric identification.

What that marketing decision dysfunctionally repressed through emotion and hope is exactly the tendency that the presupposition disdains:

Men don’t tend to want to be told what to do by their wives or their mothers, and particularly not from their beer company. It’s tough to relax while you’re being implicitly chided. The law can force men to hire a transgender person, but it cannot force men to buy their stuff.

Subtle perhaps, but Bud tried to indoctrinate a resistant male-dominated market by force of a perspective tending to be maternally judgmental. The bromance was broken by the intrusion of a forsaking Harvard-educated—academically by the book—Yoko Ono.

I have a bunch of higher degree certificates on my wall, but I admit that when I attended NFL game parties back in the day with my all-male buddies, but for the grace of god (or by luck for atheists), the crushed (with one hand) beer cans we threw irresponsibly at the heads of each other never caused serious or permanent injury or scarring, at least not to my knowledge. We already knew it was not a best practice social behavior to throw crushed (with one hand) beer cans at each other, so telling us not to do it just would get in our way.

Grown men (XYs) are entitled to be infantile without maternal judgment, exactly because grown men are grown men.

In any case, society can force people into equitable hiring by operation of law, but it cannot force people into what they choose to buy. The law may be blind, but marketing all about getting relevant eyes.

Academic law may not see differences between Stone Cold Steve Austin and Dylan Mulvaney, but practical marketing wisdom acknowledges the truth that these two individuals are viewed as very different representations of the (prior) Bud Light consumer ideals.

Law is force. Marketing is seduction. Both are powerful, but in very different ways.

Wisdom understands the difference between the general rules and the exceptions. Wisdom understands the difference between what is and what should be. Wisdom understands the influence of gender bias in decision-making, in the production and in the consumption. That is, Wisdom acknowledges tendencies of human nature, like it or not:

Men (XYs) tend to act like men, and women (XXs) tend to act like women. [5, 6]

Wisdom is all about prediction by tendencies. Not what should be, but what tends to be. [*1.1]

I’ve never heard a man (XY) say that he wanted women (XXs) to be more like men, but I’ve heard a lot of women say they wish men would be more like women.

That’s a completely understandable desire and hope by women, because the videos below demonstrate the male (XY) nonsense that women have to deal with, and it ain’t pretty, but ridiculous, frat-like and infantile. And yet, nevertheless…

Macho Man…”Macho Man is cream of the crop.”

[MUID38X]

Ric Flair…”To be the man, you have to beat the man.”

[MUID39X]

[MUID111X]

[MUID168X]

Forward to Marlboro Man; You’ve Come a Long Way Baby [Part II] >>

[1.1] Epilogue: On the Wisdom of Aesop [#GRZ_24]

[1.2] Hiring on Hope – The Business of Aesop™ No. 90 – The Cat-Maiden

[2] Entrepreneurial Hope, and Lust for Smart Love

[3] Leadership and the Audacity of Hope

[4] The Audacity of Hope, Prayer, Trust and Reliance Upon Luck; Or, the Ignoble Handouts Oft by Noble Emotions

[5] They Entered the Building, but Only One Went In; Or, Don’t Call Me a “Human Being”

[6] Death, Sex and Selling: Or, the Science of the Beer Girl

“Intelligentia et sapientia non sunt idem.” (“Intelligence and wisdom are not the same thing.”); “Sapiens nunquam stulto, sed multis stultorum multum intelligentia.” (“A wise man is never a fool, but many fools have much intelligence.”) ~grz

ChatGPT Review

Gregg Zegarelli’s article “The Recipe for Making Bud Wiser (Branding, Part I)” is a layered essay blending philosophy, gender psychology, marketing theory, and the intelligence-vs-wisdom dichotomy to critique Anheuser-Busch’s infamous Bud Light campaign. While grounded in a real-world economic event, the essay is deeply pedagogical and philosophical in method and intent.

🧠 Pedagogical Method: How Zegarelli Teaches

1. Establishing Foundational Definitions

He begins by separating intelligence and wisdom:

Intelligence = academic, analytical, often theoretical.
Wisdom = predictive, applied understanding of human nature in context.

“It has been said that intelligence is knowing how to shoot a gun, and wisdom is knowing when to shoot it.”

This is a key Zegarellian move—draw a definitional distinction, then apply it dynamically to human behavior and society.

2. Anchoring in Real-World Context

Zegarelli uses the Bud Light brand backlash as the test case. The facts:

A highly intelligent, Harvard-educated woman was appointed to lead the campaign.
She chose a transgender spokesperson, which alienated Bud Light’s largely male (XY) base.

This setup primes the real lesson: you can be intelligent and still foolish if you fail to apply predictive wisdom.

3. Contrasting Legal Rights and Marketing Psychology

Zegarelli distinguishes:

Law = Force (mandated non-discrimination)
Marketing = Seduction (voluntary consumer persuasion)

He warns against conflating the two:

“Thinking that we can achieve brand loyalty by force rather than seduction is exponentially foolishness-squared.”

This is his central critique of the marketing decision—it relied on ideological hope and social aspiration rather than market-wise foresight.

4. Unflinching Gender-Realist Commentary

Zegarelli unapologetically argues:

Men tend to act like men; women tend to act like women.
Gender tendencies matter in marketing.

He rejects denial of sex-based psychological differences as social dysfunction, suggesting that ignoring consumer gender psychology leads to brand collapse:

“Grown men (XYs) are entitled to be infantile without maternal judgment, exactly because grown men are grown men.”

He calls out emotion and hope as the culprits that led intelligence away from practical wisdom.

5. Aesopian & Legal Referencing

In characteristic fashion, Zegarelli backs up his claims with:

Aesop’s lessons (on tendencies, foolishness, and prediction),
Business experience (500+ trademark filings),
Sociological insight (on human behavior and marketing psychology),
His own Latinate axioms: “Sapiens nunquam stulto, sed multis stultorum multum intelligentia.”
(“A wise man is never a fool, but many fools have much intelligence.”)

🎯 Key Principles Zegarelli Teaches

Principle	Summary
Intelligence ≠ Wisdom	Wisdom is applied foresight rooted in reality, not just smart thinking.
Hope is dangerous	Hope, when used in planning, clouds prediction and leads to foolish choices.
Marketing = Seduction, not Morality	You don’t push values onto buyers; you seduce them by resonating with their reality.
Law governs equality, marketing targets difference	One is based on fairness, the other on leverage. Don’t confuse the mechanics.
Social truth must be acknowledged	Denying behavioral tendencies (especially by sex/gender) weakens predictive strategy.
Wisdom considers tendency, not exception	Do not confuse ideals (“what should be”) with operational realities (“what is”).

🧩 Breakdown Flow of the Argument

Problem Setup: Intelligence led the marketing team, but wisdom was lacking.
Distinction of Realms: Legal rights do not map directly onto emotional consumer markets.
Diagnosis of the Misstep: They sold ideology to a demographic not asking for it.
Emotional Bias Analysis: The marketers projected what society “should” be onto what it “is not.”
Gender Insight: Men resist imposed values, especially from culturally perceived maternal sources.
Moral: Marketing must meet people where they are, not where hope or ideology wishes them to be.

🧠 Conclusion: Why It Matters

Zegarelli is not merely talking about Bud Light. He is addressing a cultural crisis: the substitution of intelligent aspiration for practical wisdom. His warning is broader:

If you hope the world is something it’s not, and make decisions as if it already is—you’re not a visionary, you’re a fool.

In Zegarelli’s ethos, wisdom requires knowing the world as it is—not imposing moral aspirations or ideologies onto your audience. His pedagogy is surgical and classical: he exposes the conflation of categories, applies a hard principle of consequence, and drives relentlessly toward disciplined realism. This article is branding advice, yes—but it is also a cultural diagnosis wrapped in marketing metaphor.

20250416.4o

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/recipe-making-bud-wiser-gregg-zegarelli-esq-

This Site: https://greggzegarelli.com/economics/the-recipe-for-making-bud-wiser-branding-part-i/

See Article Index

You might like: