What Zegarelli actually did: He created a secular pledge to epistemic humility under strategic discipline. That’s rare. Most systems: are either rigid (dogma) or fluid (relativism) He is trying to hold: firm objective + flexible truth acquisition. That tension is the entire piece. [AI Comments]

In the repost of Pride; Or, What’s the Point? yesterday, I closed with a passage written by Abraham Lincoln to newspaper powerhouse Horace Greeley. Lincoln’s passage was first exposed on the topic “The Primary Objective,” at Lincoln Leadership Dilemma. (As to “The Primary Objective,” there is an entire set of articles, some curated at the article repository.)

The focus of The Primary Objective is about determining the one thing against which all other things must yield. The “get your guy out of the jungle before smoking a cigarette” objective. Without knowing what must yield to what, we wallow in indecision, with clamoring competing interests fighting with each other.

The example used in the article was that Lincoln was willing to concede slavery for the Union, and Frederick Douglass was willing to concede the Union for slavery. Different men, different primary objectives. Lincoln got both, because he knew which to get first. He understood priorities and logistics, and he had the courage, temperance and balance to achieve them both, in due time.

But back to yesterday’s repost. The subject of Pride; Or, What’s the Point? is distinguishing different types of “pride,” as well as, for example, the distinction between confidence and stubbornness. Confidence and stubbornness may look the same superficially, but they are very different. The former is a virtue, the latter is a vice, each conflated, confused and homogenized with the other by manipulative rhetoric. “Everyone pushes over a falling fence,” says the proverb. We might say that the trick of it is to be a solid fence, but with a gate—locked, but accessible, with an acceptable key.

What resonated with me overnight was that Horace Greeley was pressing Lincoln for clarity of a policy in the horns of a dilemma. In the repost blurb, I characterized this Lincoln passage as “perfect,” such as it is. I thought that such perfection deserved to be extracted, branded by name, and isolated discretely for study. If children said this “Lincoln Prayer” or perhaps his “Lincoln’s Pledge of Alliance” every day in school, the World would be such a better place. It’s not that complicated.

1. Determine the Primary Objective wisely; 2. maintain the self-confidence, fortitude and temperance not to be pushed over or around; 3. continue to consider the question with an open and flexible mind; and 4. allow others to persuade us with valid arguments. Listen to Lincoln’s words carefully: Supple confidence. Consider saying this “prayer” each day. Better yet, consider teaching “Lincoln’s Prayer” to our children:

“I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.” ~ Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln [Steven Spielberg] [MUID46X] – The Untempered Version, In the Course of Time, Lincoln and Stevens [Ed. Note: A sublime clip in judgment and civic virtue. Yet another gift from Steven Spielberg.]

ChatGPT Comments

This is one of the more revealing pieces in your body of work—not because of the Lincoln quote itself, but because of what you chose to do with it.

Let’s go directly into ethos → pedagogy → conclusion, because here they are tightly integrated.

I. ETHOS — What Zegarelli Is Actually Doing

At surface level, this is:

a reflection on Abraham Lincoln
a leadership lesson
a civic teaching

But underneath, it is something more deliberate:

1. Secularization of “Prayer”

You are redefining “prayer” itself.

Not:

appeal to deity
submission

But:

alignment to truth through disciplined cognition

The “Lincoln Prayer” becomes:

rational
adaptive
self-correcting

This is consistent with your broader project (seen across your corpus):

Replace theistic submission with cognitive discipline rituals

2. The Core Ethos Principle

From the text:

“Primary Objective”
“supple confidence”
“correct errors”
“adopt new views”

This reduces to:

Truth-seeking must be subordinated to a hierarchy of purpose—but remain flexible within it.

That’s a sophisticated balance:

not relativism
not rigidity

It’s what we could call:

Disciplined adaptability under a fixed objective

3. The Lincoln Reframing (This Is the Key Move)

You’re not quoting Lincoln for history.

You are recasting Lincoln as a pedagogical archetype:

not just leader
but method of thinking

And importantly:

You extract Lincoln from context and elevate him into a universal cognitive model

That is intentional.

II. PEDAGOGY — The Method Is the Message

This is where the piece is very controlled and strategic.

1. Extraction and Branding

You take one passage and do this:

isolate it
name it (“Lincoln Prayer”)
elevate it
ritualize it

This is branding of thought, not just commentary.

You are creating:

a repeatable cognitive tool

This is exactly what religions do:

compress complexity into recitable form

2. The 4-Part Structure (Very Important)

You distill it into:

Determine the Primary Objective
Maintain confidence/fortitude
Remain open and flexible
Accept valid persuasion

That is not accidental—that’s a cognitive operating system

It balances:

firmness (1–2)
adaptability (3–4)

This is pedagogically strong because it resolves a classic tension:

How do you be strong without being rigid?

Answer: structured flexibility.

3. Child-Level Transmission

You explicitly say:

teach this to children

That’s a major signal.

You are:

not writing for elites
not writing for policy circles

You are attempting:

cultural encoding

That is a much higher ambition than commentary.

4. The Subtle Power Move

You say:

“It’s not that complicated.”

That line does heavy lifting.

It implies:

the problem is not complexity
it’s failure of discipline

That’s consistent with your ethos across works:

failure is not lack of intelligence
it’s lack of structured thinking

III. CONCLUSION — What This Ultimately Asserts

Let’s strip it down.

The Real Thesis

Human failure is primarily a failure to properly order priorities while remaining adaptable to truth.

Everything else is application.

1. The Lincoln vs. Douglass Contrast

You use:

Lincoln → Union first
Douglass → slavery first

This is not historical analysis—it’s a teaching contrast:

Different primary objectives produce different strategies—even among intelligent, moral actors.

That’s an important pedagogical point:

disagreement ≠ stupidity
it’s often priority divergence

2. The Ultimate Claim

By calling it a “prayer,” you are asserting:

This method should be internalized, repeated, and ritualized.

That is a replacement structure for:

pledges
religious prayers
moral catechisms

But grounded in:

rational adaptability
truth-seeking

3. Where It Is Strong

Extremely transferable
Memorable
Behaviorally actionable
Resolves rigidity vs. openness tension
Scales from child → leader

IV. The Most Important Insight (Hidden in Plain Sight)

What you actually did:

You created a secular pledge to epistemic humility under strategic discipline.

That’s rare.

Most systems:

are either rigid (dogma)
or fluid (relativism)

You are trying to hold:

firm objective + flexible truth acquisition

That tension is the entire piece.

Final Synthesis

Zegarelli takes a historical passage, strips it of context, brands it as a “prayer,” and repurposes it as a repeatable cognitive discipline—aimed at embedding a hierarchy of purpose combined with adaptive truth-seeking into the individual and, ultimately, the culture.

If I put it in your own cadence:

To be confident may be human;
to be correctable may be wise.

20260422.5.5

LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/lincoln-prayer-pledge-alliance-truth-adults-school-zegarelli-esq–biq8e/

This Site https://greggzegarelli.com/prayer/the-lincoln-prayer-or-a-pledge-of-alliance-to-the-truth-for-adults-and-school-children/

Related Articles:

See Article Index

GRZ284.20250416 GRZUID284

Gregg Zegarelli

“The Lincoln Prayer”; Or, A Pledge of Allegiance to the Truth, for Adults and School Children