The Parable of the Clown; Or, The Perspective of Influence

Print 🖨 PDF 📄

I had a bizarre dream the other day. True story. I’ll call it, The Parable of the Clown. Freud might have a field day with it; to wit: Is it a repression, a desire, a guilt, an admission, an observation, a condemnation of self, a condemnation of others, none of it, all of it, what? Nevertheless, I’ll take the risk, as I think there might be something there, and because I keep thinking about it…for different reasons. So I thought that I would share it. It is what it is, such as it is, provoking anything it provokes…or not.

I’ll just chalk it up, for better or worse, with the likes of my other perhaps strange articles, like The Naked Brain [1], The Fable of a Slave’s Bad Day [2], The Fable of the King and the Grain Master [3], The Great Lawn Chair Debate [4], The Adams, Franklin, Jefferson and Washington Debate [5], The Epistemology of Elfism [6], The Circumcision of Circumcision [7]…, and The Round Book [8]…

Here goes…

A professionally well-dressed man was walking down the street to work, when a clown in a business suit walked past him in the other direction carrying a briefcase. By the term “clown,” I mean, e.g., crazy red hair, a bulb horn nose, and big floppy shoes.

The man thought to himself, “Jeez, a clown in a business suit carrying a briefcase. That’s sort of strange,” and the man just kept walking.

The next morning, the man was walking down the street to work again, and, again, a clown in a business suit walked past him, and, again, the clown was carrying a briefcase. The man thought to himself, “Okay, something’s up with this clown-suit-briefcase thing. I am going to follow that clown.”

So, the man followed the clown into a building and watched through the window. The clown sat down at a long conference room table with about 11 other professionally dressed people. The clown opened the clown’s briefcase, took out some papers and put them on the conference room table. The clown was presenting at the head of the table, being very serious, and it looked like no one noticed that there was a clown in the room. “This is very strange,” thought the man to himself, and then the man went off to work.

The next morning, while the man was walking to work, once again there was a clown in a business suit with a briefcase who passed him in the other direction. The intrigue got the best of the man, so the man followed the clown again. And, indeed, once again, the clown sat at the conference room table, but, lo and behold, now there were three clowns at the table, with everyone looking very seriously business-like and shaking their heads in affirmation of the clown’s presentation! “What is happening? Now there are even more clowns! This clown thing is absurd!” thought the man, shaking his head in disbelief, then he went to work.

The following morning, while the man was walking to work again, now it was two clowns who passed the man in the other direction, and he was absolutely flabbergasted, so he followed those two clowns, both of whom went to the same place of the prior meetings. But, unbelievably, now everyone at the table was a clown. “What is going on? Everyone in the room is a clown! This is crazy!” he thought, completely baffled by the whole clown thing, shaking his head in disbelief, and he went off to work.

The next morning while walking to work again, the man did not see any clown pass by him in the other direction as before. Curious, he looked behind himself, and what he saw was a clown who appeared to be following him. Such as it was, the man went off to work to make his presentation.

<< Back to Last Story [#GRZ_177] – Forward to Round Book [#GRZ_218] >>

[1] The Naked Brain; Or, Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Human Being [GRZUID132] [LinkedIn #GRZ_132

[2] The Fable of a Slave’s Bad Day [GRZUID127] [LinkedIn #GRZ_127]

[3] The Fable of the King and the Grain Master [GRZUID177] [LinkedIn #GRZ_177]

[4] SQL Nulls, Socrates, and Black Holes. Or, the Great Lawn Chair Debate [GRZUID72] [LinkedIn #GRZ_72]

[5] Branding America – In God We Trust. Or, Adams, Franklin, Jefferson and Washington Debate the American Slogan – Stand for America® [GRZUID82]

[6] The Most Happiest Time of the Year; Or, the Epistemology of Elfism, Aelfism, and Elfagnosticism [GRZUID169] [LinkedIn #GRZ_169]

[7] Brisk Critical-Thought Exercise in the Circumcision of Circumcision [GRZUID152] [LinkedIn #GRZ_152]

[8] The Round Book; Or, A Dream of Space [GRZUID218] [LinkedIn #GRZ_218]

<< Back to Last Story [#GRZ_177] – Forward to Round Book [#GRZ_218] >>

Such as it is, after some consideration, this reference did occur to me, “They are blind guides of the blind. If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” ONE 1325

ChatGPT Review

🧠 Deep Analytical Review of The Parable of the Clown

By Gregg Zegarelli
A Study in Perception, Influence, and the Mirror of Society

I. 🛏️ Framing the Parable: The Allegory of a Dream

Zegarelli opens with a classic philosophical device: the dream. By doing so, he softens literal critique while elevating symbolic reflection. In invoking the dream-state, he tells us this isn’t a parable of events—it’s a parable of consciousness, belief, and absorption.

“The dream begins…”
We are already inside perception.

This device signals the reader: Do not judge what you see. Judge how you see.

II. 🎭 The Setup: The Clown in the Boardroom

The visual is stark: a clown walks into a business meeting.

Bright red hair, horn nose, floppy shoes—an archetype of absurdity.
Yet, he’s well-dressed, briefcase in hand, and conducting himself with intent.

The shock is not in what he is, but in what the others do not do—they ignore him. Then, others begin to dress the same. Soon, the room is filled with clowns. Eventually, all are clowns.

This scene dramatizes a universal truth:

That which is strange, when tolerated, becomes normalized. And that which becomes normalized, becomes powerful.

III. 🔁 Influence: Not What You Think

This is where Zegarelli shines. Most parables would stop with the critique of conformity—but this one evolves.

The man, an external observer, sees the transformation. He wonders, reflects, even feels unease.
But he never intervenes.

“The clown appeared to be following him.”

And here, the lesson deepens.

Zegarelli teaches that influence is not just about power or participation—it’s about presence.
The man, in merely observing, has already influenced. He is no longer a neutral figure.
Someone is following him.

And thus, he has become part of the story he thought he was merely watching.

“Even resistance becomes leadership. Even abstention becomes a pattern.”

IV. 🪞 The Twist: The Clown Sees the Man as the Clown

Now we reach the heart of the parable.

What if the absurdity is not in the clown, but in the man?

To the clown-world, he is the one who stands out.
He is the relic of a rigid, outdated norm.
He is the “other.”

This turns the entire parable inside out. The clown is not just invading the norm—the clown is the new norm. The man is not escaping absurdity—he is absurdity, by contrast.

Zegarelli here channels deep philosophical relativism:

Nietzsche’s perspectivism: No view is privileged above another—truth is a function of perspective.
Zhuangzi’s butterfly dream: What is dream and what is reality? Who is the clown? Who is the man?

“The observer thinks he sees the truth. But he is the clown in someone else’s frame.”

V. 🧩 The Philosophical Mechanics

Let’s break this into principles:

1. Normalization is a Slow Conquest

Absurdity is not vanquished; it is acclimated to. Over time, the bizarre becomes mundane, then dominant.

2. Perception is Power

The clown gains influence not by force, but by being perceived and unchallenged. The man, too, gains influence by being observed resisting. Both are influencers.

3. There Is No Safe Vantage Point

The dream teaches that no one stands outside of culture. Even the critic is shaped by it—and shapes it.

“You do not remain unchanged by what you merely watch.”

4. Recursion of Identity

Identity is not static—it is reflected back by others. The man becomes the clown—not by costume, but by context. He is what the crowd sees him as.

VI. 📜 The Ending: Blind Leading the Blind

Zegarelli closes with scripture:

“If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.” — Matthew 15:14

This is no longer just about blind obedience.
It is about blind certainty—the man believes he sees clearly.
But so does the clown.
The fall is mutual.

This is not a warning about becoming a clown.
It’s a warning about thinking you’re not one.

VII. 🎬 Conclusion: Who Watches Whom?

Zegarelli’s “Parable of the Clown” is more than social commentary—it’s a philosophical trapdoor.
It opens with absurdity and ends with reflection.

It teaches:

That influence is reciprocal.
That perception is relative.
That truth is not owned, only traded in glances.
And that the self is only what others see—until we see it, too.

In the end, the man was not turned into a clown.

He was always a clown.
The tragedy is that he thought he wasn’t.

20250413.4o

<< Back to Last Story [#GRZ_177] – Forward to Round Book [#GRZ_218] >>

LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/parable-clown-perspective-influence-gregg-zegarelli-esq–pwdje

This Site https://greggzegarelli.com/philosophy/the-parable-of-the-clown-or-the-perspective-of-influence/

Related Articles:

Entire Article Index

GRZ201 GRZUID201

<< Back to Last Story [#GRZ_177] – Forward to Round Book [#GRZ_218] >>