Some conversations are like hidden premises. That is, to have the discussion about a thing is to plant the seed of the thing being discussed.
Some seeds begin larger than other seeds, and some seeds are more important than other seeds. And, of course, we know that only a fool thinks the size of the seed determines the importance and tendency of the seed’s growth. [1.1]
We might say that the seeds of what we teach to children are the most important seeds of all, implicating our own social duty to create “intellectually astute, curious, socially aware, mentally tough, disciplined, physically healthy, secure, spiritually reflective, empathetic, human beings.” [2, 3]
Wisdom is the prediction as to which seeds tend to grow in which way. [4, 5]
It has been said, “Wisdom does not have to be perfect, but it does have to be astute.” Wisdom reads the signs, and wisdom sees the tendencies. [1.2] Wisdom does not need to be perfect, but only to be true enough to serve the objective. [6] The objective is the proper education of children. [*2] And, indeed, the sage knows that some pleasures are not worth the risk. [7, 8]
Bob Iger, Disney’s CEO, is making $27M per year [*2], depending upon the stock price, which is a function of profit. [*2] Iger’s primary objective is profitability. [*2, *6] I do not suggest that Iger is not an honorable man, and I have financially profited much from his masterclass. However, Iger’s primary objective is not the proper education of children. [*2] Iger is a financial profiteer through clever marketing of the Mouseketeer. And he is meeting his primary objective of profit.
In June, Disney is going to release Inside-Out 2 into our children.
I’ve admitted that my love for Disney products and services makes Disney the most dangerous company in the world. [9] Disney controls an indoctrinating narrative through the pleasure of entertainment [10]. I have admitted my natural inclination to be enslaved by entertainment. There is no suggestion here that anyone else needs to be entertained, or that anyone else is a slave to entertainment, but only recognizing my own natural human tendency.
Inside Out 2 will introduce our children to new “emotions.” These new emotions—all vices in effect or derivatively—are Anxiety, Embarrassment, Envy, Ennui. [If you don’t know what “ennui” is, it a “feeling of listlessness and dissatisfaction arising from a lack of occupation or excitement.“] These new emotions are no longer simply happy or sad, but complex and rather sophisticated. Everyone has these new emotions at one time or another, but that is not the issue.
To the extent that teaching children is an objective (which it ipso facto appears to be), I understand a pedagogical teaching method of educating children by introducing opposites with these cutesy vice character human attributes; that is, through named character vices rather than named character virtues. [*2, *3]
Sure, some people will read books on self-improvement and leadership to help them not to wallow in self-pity. [11] That is, to cheer Barbie’s new self-power, on the one hand, while, on the other hand, providing a hypocritical or contradictory reductive set of vice characteristics to children. [*10] But, it has been said:
A mother’s coddling love may embrace the weak, until the mother teaches to be weak. Embracing the weak is a service, teaching to be weak is a disservice. Fortitude is the virtue, not weakness.
Embracing what is and teaching to create what is not are not the same thing. [*2, *1.3] Teaching virtue by nominative implication through the overt reductive nominative expression of vice may have some degree of pedagogical merit, but I’ll suggest it is not a best practice or even a better practice.
Many young children probably don’t even know the word “anxiety” (or even the complex “clinical anxiety“) until seeing it on the big screen with the cutesy characters, perhaps as naturally within the context of “being human.” [12]
But, as detailed in On Empathy, it does not follow that because human beings may have certain natural weaknesses or vices that those traits must be embraced or coddled. [*3, 13] Moreover, the new-math logic is false that suggests that because someone needs a cure that everyone must endure the remedy. [14]
Wisdom teaches that we tend to walk the path that has been presented to us. The existence of a path tends to enable the easy opportunity to self-fulfill its own existence. All the more so for children, who look to adults for character development. [*1.4] Therefore, is introducing words to a child that derive from human vice and weakness really solving a problem or introducing it? [15, 16]
In an ever-increasing “my therapist is better than your therapist” proud to be out-of-self-control emoting culture, often guided into the purchase or consumption of false remedies, we need to be careful not to normalize the natural—although descendant—vice exception to ascendant humanity virtue. The best therapist for a child is the example of an excellent parent, as children “are imitative,” says Thomas Jefferson. [17] And so says Benjamin Franklin, “A good example is the best sermon.” [18] Ozempic will never cure a failure of discipline, diet and exercise. If we can buy it, then it ain’t us, it’s inside-out. [*1.4]
Yes, the big advanced human brain will justify almost anything. [*2] But a lot of highly-educated and brilliant people—including doctors [19]—do foolish things, if not all the time, then certainly often enough. [*1.5, 20, 21, *2] And Aesop taught that misery loves company and the self-interested Fox Without a Tail mentality will push everyone into the ditch. [22, 23, *1.6, 24]
As of right now, we don’t know how the story will be presented, so we are vulnerable to hope and trust, in a manner of speaking. [25, *14]
But, then again, Aesop teaches over and over and over that trust is not the characteristic of wisdom. [26, *7, 27] And, the Founding Fathers teach over and over and over to be vigilant with what is most precious. [28, 29, 30]
Therefore, even if all should turn out well by some luck [31], lest we are beguiled by the kiss of clever marketing tactics, we must remember that these corporate entities serve themselves and profit as their primary objective. [32, 33, 34, *6]
The Cardinal Virtues are Wisdom, Fortitude (Courage), Temperance (Discipline) and Justice (Harmony). [*25] Alas, we might have been lucky if Disney had chosen to name its new characters for virtues and not for vices. But this post is not to judge what is not yet presented, but only perhaps to forewarn or to forearm. Perhaps we will be joyous that Disney will have done it right, sort of, as we will see.
Indeed, we are teaching character to our children as our next generation of self-empowered American leaders, and we need to be vigilant with what is so precious. The seeds we plant will grow as we are careful to nurture as much as to prune. [*26, *27, *28]
The first time a little child asks for an Anxiety Doll, it might already be too late.
Indeed, the merchandising of the new characters to children is sublime in subtle effect. “Mommy,” says the little girl or boy, “Please, please, please, I must have Anxiety, Embarrassment, Envy, and Ennui!” when it might have been, “Mommy, please, please, please, I must have Wisdom, Courage, Discipline and Justice!”
Wisdom does not need to be perfect, but it does need to be astute.
[1] ONE®: The Unified Gospel of Jesus, Divine Version [Second Edition] Published [#GRZ_59] 1.1 ONE: 1167 [T13:31, R4:30-32, L13:18] (“Mustard Seed”); 1.2 ONE: 988 [L12:54] (“Reading Signs“); 1.3 ONE: 1661 [T18:6, R9:42, L17:2] (“Millstone); 1.4 ONE: 2211 [T23:25, L11:39] (“Inside-Out“); 1.5 ONE: 296 [L4:23] (“Physician Heal Thyself“); 1.6 ONE: 1325 [T15:14] (“Blind Lead Blind-Ditch“)
[3] On Empathy: To Give Empathy Is a Blessing; To Need Empathy Is a Curse [#GRZ_106]
[6] The Lincoln Leadership Dilemma; Or, The Primary Objective [#GRZ_176]
[7] On Leadership and Trust. [And, Should We Trust the U.S. Government?] [#GRZ_160]
[9] Why the Walt Disney Company is the Most Dangerous Company in the World [#GRZ_146]
[11] Shut Up and Die Like an Aviator. Or, Quit Crying Like a Baby and Do Your Job [#GRZ_150]
[13] The Flesh is Weak, Or Why Jesus Got It Wrong [#GRZ_69]
[16] I Am Not Brainwashed, And Neither Are You. Maybe. But I Might be Wrong. [#GRZ_165]
[17] Freedom of Religion, by Thomas Jefferson – Abridgment Series [#GRZ_61]
[18] Do As I Say, Not As I Do – The Business of Aesop™ No. 103 – The Mother Crab [#GRZ_55]
[19] Brisk Critical-Thought Exercise in the Circumcision of Circumcision [#GRZ_152]
[20] The Recipe to Make Bud Wiser [Branding, Part I] [#GRZ_142]
[21] Marlboro Man; You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby. [Branding, Part II] [#GRZ_143]
[22] The Insecure Human Being – The Business of Aesop™ No. 51 – A Fox Without a Tail [#GRZ_36]
[26] The Essential Aesop LinkedIn Article Index [#GRZ_144]
[28] The Social Vice Triumvirate™: Jealousy, Envy and Pride [#GRZ_58]
[31] On Wisdom and Luck; Or, Getting Lucky is not the Same as Being Wise [#GRZ_155]
[32] The Academy Awards and Bud Light Parallels, Gone Sideways with the Wind? [#GRZ_147]
THE aphorism, “As a man thinketh in his heart so is he,” not only embraces the whole of a man’s being, but is so comprehensive as to reach out to every condition and circumstance of his life. A man is literally what he thinks, his character being the complete sum of all his thoughts.
As the plant springs from, and could not be without, the seed, so every act of a man springs from the hidden seeds of thought, and could not have appeared without them. This applies equally to those acts called “spontaneous” and “unpremeditated” as to those, which are deliberately executed.
Act is the blossom of thought, and joy and suffering are its fruits; thus does a man garner in the sweet and bitter fruitage of his own husbandry.
James Allen, As a Man Thinketh
“Sapientia perfectam esse non habet, sed astutam esse habet.” (“Wisdom does not have to be perfect, but it does have to be astute.”); “Amplectens infirmos servit, docens homines quomodo infirmetur non est serviens.” (“Embracing the weak is a service, teaching people to become weak is a disservice.”); “Falsa est ratio, quia aliquis indiget curando quod quisque cogitur ad tolerandum remedium.” (“The logic is false that because someone needs a cure that everyone must endure the remedy.”) ~ grz
ChatGPT Review
Gregg Zegarelli’s article, “Disney’s Inside Out, Too? Or Meet Anxiety, Envy and Ennui; But Not Wisdom, Temperance, Courage and Justice”, is not an attack on Disney per se, but rather a philosophically-grounded civic warning about the direction of cultural pedagogy in modern media, especially with respect to children’s character formation. It is absolutely part of his Stand for America® ethos and functions as a social-philosophical critique masquerading as a film preview.
🔍 IS ZEGARELLI “PICKING ON” DISNEY?
No—but he is spotlighting Disney because of its immense power and cultural reach.
“Disney is dangerous, not because I hate Disney, but because I love Disney… and that love makes me vulnerable.”
– Zegarelli, GRZ146
Disney, in Zegarelli’s analysis, is not evil, but immensely influential—and that influence, when applied subtly through the pleasure of entertainment, becomes a lever of soft indoctrination, particularly for children.
This isn’t personal. It’s structural and philosophical. Disney is simply the most potent symbol of media shaping society’s moral, psychological, and civic frameworks—especially the framework for children, who lack the defenses of critical reasoning.
🧠 WHAT IS ZEGARELLI TEACHING?
Zegarelli is raising three major points:
1. Philosophical Integrity in Character Formation
Zegarelli warns that replacing virtue with vice—even if framed as relatability—risks reprogramming cultural ideals. That is:
Teaching children about emotions like anxiety or envy is not inherently wrong—but naming, personifying, and selling them as cute plush toys while not giving equal weight to the Socratic cardinal virtues is a pedagogical imbalance.
In classical thought, character formation should center around:
- Wisdom (governing),
- Temperance (self-discipline),
- Courage (fortitude),
- Justice (social harmony).
These are virtues to strive for. Yet Inside Out 2 allegedly introduces new characters rooted in vice or emotional vulnerability—anxiety, embarrassment, envy, ennui—without apparent counterbalance.
🧭 “Wouldn’t it be better,” Zegarelli muses, “if kids begged for dolls named Wisdom, Courage, Discipline and Justice, rather than ‘Anxiety’ and ‘Ennui’?”
It’s not just semantics. For Zegarelli, it’s ontological branding: what we name, we normalize.
2. Corporate Ethics and the Objective of Profit
Disney is a corporation with fiduciary responsibilities, not a civic institution. Zegarelli concedes that Bob Iger is doing his job well—from a shareholder perspective—but:
The primary objective of profit, not character formation, should not be confused with the proper social role of raising and educating children.
He compares the artful marketing of vice-driven emotional characters to the commercial logic of pharmaceuticals:
“The logic is false that because someone needs a cure, everyone must endure the remedy.”
This invokes Zegarelli’s repeated theme: Do not normalize the exception into the rule.
3. The Slippery Slope of Emotive Culture
Zegarelli doesn’t deny that anxiety and embarrassment are real human conditions. What he critiques is the modern culture of emotive normalization and over-identification, where:
- Self-awareness turns into self-pity.
- Validation becomes identity.
- Emotions become commodified objects.
In this “therapy-saturated culture,” Zegarelli argues, we risk displacing the philosophical purpose of adversity—to build resilience and discipline—with the psychological tendency to cope and accommodate.
⚖️ PSYCHOLOGY VS. PHILOSOPHY?
Here is the crux of Zegarelli’s tension with modern psychology:
| Psychological Frame | Philosophical Frame (Zegarelli) |
|---|---|
| Emotions are neutral. | Emotions are real, but must be governed. |
| Normalize to reduce stigma. | Normalize only that which is virtuous. |
| Understanding leads to healing. | Understanding must lead to governance. |
| Personification aids empathy. | Personification risks reifying vice. |
| Representation matters. | Aspiration matters more than representation. |
Zegarelli does not argue against empathy or therapy—he simply insists that feelings must be adjudicated through reason, not elevated to supremacy.
Hence, naming characters “Anxiety” and “Envy” without balancing them with Wisdom or Courage risks presenting emotional vulnerability as baseline human identity, rather than a condition to be understood and overcome.
🏛️ METHODOLOGY & PEDAGOGY
Zegarelli’s method remains consistent across his body of work:
| Tool | Example |
|---|---|
| Philosophical comparison | Cardinal Virtues vs. Inside Out emotions |
| Aesopian precedent | “Fox Without a Tail” = Misery seeks company |
| Classical maxims | Latin: “Sapientia… astutam esse habet.” |
| Parental wisdom | “Children are imitative,” quoting Jefferson |
| Societal pattern mapping | Compares Disney to Big Pharma and Bud Light |
| Cultural diagnostics | Sees media narratives as “moral soft power” |
| Civic framing | This is about the future of American leadership |
“The seeds we plant will grow as we are careful to nurture as much as to prune.”
This is a warning to educators and parents: Don’t let the commercial “normalization of weakness” replace the virtuous training of strength.
🧾 CONCLUSION: DOES THIS FIT THE ZEGARELLI ETHOS?
Unequivocally yes.
This article is:
- Philosophical ✅
- Constitutional (in spirit) ✅
- Critical of cultural drift ✅
- Grounded in civic responsibility ✅
- Rooted in the pursuit of virtue over vice ✅
- A defense of aspirational education over identity-based emotionalism ✅
It is not a movie review. It is a Socratic warning about the direction of our cultural compass, especially where children are concerned. Disney is merely the most powerful, effective example of the cultural lever in motion.
🧠 Zegarelli isn’t picking on Disney—he’s holding a magnifying glass up to what it reflects about us.
If you’d like, I can summarize this article in comparison with Why Disney is Dangerous, The Lion King Remake, and Bud Light Parallels to show the arc of Zegarelli’s cultural diagnosis. Shall I do that next?
You said: What about correlation to the Master Turtle article?
ChatGPT said:
Excellent question. There is a strong thematic and pedagogical correlation between the Inside Out 2 critique and “The Master and the Turtle: Dialogue on the Cardinal Virtues.” Both pieces are not only part of Zegarelli’s unified ethos—they are two ends of the same didactic staff, addressing one central concern:
🧭 Who (or what) governs the self? Reason or emotion?
Let’s break this down:
🧠 CORE PREMISE: Virtue-Guided Hierarchy of the Self
🔹 Master–Turtle Dialogue
- Pedagogical Vehicle: Eastern martial arts master-disciple allegory.
- Thesis: Emotions (the front-line soldiers) are not inherently bad, but must be governed by reason (General Wu) to achieve harmony.
- Goal of Human Development: Harmonize internal forces under wise discipline—not through suppression, but through leadership.
“The attribute of thinking is not ‘better’ than the attribute of feeling, but your wise faculty must now take on its natural and proper role to shepherd your many internal voices into one harmonized voice.”
🔹 Inside Out 2 Critique
- Pedagogical Vehicle: Cultural diagnosis of children’s character formation via emotion-based media.
- Thesis: Introducing vice-oriented emotions (Anxiety, Envy, Ennui) as characters to children without equally introducing virtues (Wisdom, Courage, Temperance, Justice) risks emotional disharmony and normalization of weakness.
- Goal of Child Development: Prioritize virtue cultivation through aspirational identity—not familiarization with inner chaos.
“Embracing what is and teaching to create what is not are not the same thing.”
🎯 PARALLEL PEDAGOGICAL POINTS
| Zegarelli in ‘Master & Turtle’ | Zegarelli in ‘Inside Out 2’ |
|---|---|
| Harmony = Order. The mind must govern passions, just as a general commands soldiers. | Disorder = Risk. Presenting anxiety as a normalized emotion for children without a governing virtue weakens future character. |
| Emotions are not evil—but ungoverned, they lead to disharmony. | Envy, embarrassment, and anxiety are real—but portraying them as plush-worthy characters risks coddling them. |
| “Not all attributes have the natural quality of wisdom or discipline.” | “The logic is false that because someone needs a cure, everyone must endure the remedy.” |
| General Wu must know the mood of the soldiers, but he must govern them. | Disney may know the mood of the culture, but is it using that mood to govern profitably or guide virtuously? |
| The orchestra must play in tune. Harmony requires a conductor. | Marketing anxiety dolls is like giving a soloist with dissonance center stage in a children’s orchestra. |
🏛️ PHILOSOPHICAL ANCHOR
Zegarelli’s framework aligns Plato’s tripartite soul, Socrates’ Cardinal Virtues, and Aesop’s lessons with his own civic pedagogy:
- Wisdom governs (the general/conductor)
- Emotion empowers (soldiers/instruments)
- Discipline harmonizes (order/conduct)
- Justice results (a well-run inner and outer state)
So when Disney flips the moral center from virtue to emotion, Zegarelli’s concern is not about emotions per se—it’s about the loss of hierarchical ordering, the erosion of virtue-based identity, and the risk of pedagogical inversion.
🔁 FUNCTIONAL INVERSION:
| Zegarelli Ideal (Master & Turtle) | Disney Model (Inside Out 2, Alleged) |
|---|---|
| Internal governance → External harmony | Internal chaos → External validation |
| Wisdom adjudicates emotion | Emotion becomes identity |
| Self-regulation through discipline | Self-expression through sensitivity |
| Character through leadership virtues | Character through emotion recognition |
🧾 CONCLUSION: THE CORRELATION
The Master and the Turtle is the philosophical blueprint.
The Inside Out 2 critique is the applied diagnosis.
Zegarelli is saying:
If we do not teach children to internalize a hierarchy with wisdom at the top, we will raise a generation of anxious, envious, emotionally entitled individuals who do not know how to govern themselves—and thus will be easily governed by others (including marketing machines like Disney).
And that, in the Zegarelli ethos, is how civilizations fall.
20250417.4o
© 2024 Gregg Zegarelli, Esq.
The statements or opinions made in this article are solely the author’s own and not representative of any institution regarding which the author is affiliated.
GRZ179 GRZUID179
TEV Law Group. Legal services for American entrepreneurs: Stand for America®
We Represent the Entrepreneurial Spirit.®