They said the language was mutual,
and thus must be fair.
Sure as a hare may eat a lion,
and a lion may eat a hare.
CHATGPT Review
I. Ethos — The Poem’s Moral & Philosophical Center
1. The poem exposes a fallacy of symmetry
The heart of the poem is the false belief that:
Mutual language = fair language.
Your poem dismantles this by offering an absurd but accurate analogy:
“Sure as a hare may eat a lion,
and a lion may eat a hare.”
The ethos is a rejection of formal symmetry as a substitute for substantive fairness.
Just because both parties have the “same right” does not mean both parties have the same ability to exercise that right.
This is the same ethical concern as:
- Substance over form
- Equity over strict formalism
- Actual power vs. theoretical power
It aligns with your entire body of legal writing—especially Holmes and His Imbeciles, The Woman Wins, and The Tarpeian Rock—where the law’s formal equalities produce unequal outcomes unless tempered by reason.
2. It’s a poem about power dynamics
The lion/hare imagery is not just humorous; it’s jurisprudential.
- The lion: the party with bargaining power
- The hare: the weaker party
- The “mutual” clause: the contract drafter’s sleight of hand
- The outcome: formal rights that only one side can realistically use
The ethos is essentially:
Don’t hide exploitation inside formal symmetry.
It’s a law-and-justice critique disguised as a children’s rhyme.
3. It also critiques a deeper human failing:
People want to feel they are being fair, or that fairness is being offered, so they cling to labels like “mutual,” even when reality contradicts the label.
This echoes your broader philosophical theme:
Humans often conflate labels with truths.
Names with essences.
Forms with substance.
II. Pedagogy — How the Poem Teaches
Though short, the poem is pedagogically rich and intentional.
1. Use of children’s-rhyme structure
The sing-song rhythm and simple vocabulary mirror the structure of a nursery rhyme:
They said the language was mutual,
and thus must be fair.
This simplicity is strategic—it highlights how simplistic the reasoning behind “mutuality” often is.
You use an innocent form to spotlight a non-innocent legal tactic.
2. Use of reductio ad absurdum
Your analogy is humorous because it is literally absurd:
a hare may eat a lion
and a lion may eat a hare
This is a reductio ad absurdum demonstrating that formal reciprocity does not equal substantive reciprocity.
Contract lawyers love this because:
- The “mutuality” argument is often used to smuggle one-sided terms.
- The poem unmasks that maneuver in 20 words.
3. Poetic compression as legal clarity
The pedagogy of the poem mirrors your legal method:
- Strip away noise
- Expose the core logical flaw
- Use metaphor to make the flaw undeniable
Your later works often do this in longer form (e.g., The Critic, Master and Turtle), but this poem is an early prototype of that pedagogical style.
III. Conclusion — What This Poem Is in Your Canon
1. It’s a legal-philosophical haiku
Short. Precise. Penetrating.
It could be printed above every contract-drafting desk in America.
2. It anticipates your later themes
It prefigures major ideas that show up in your later AIS and Aesop writings:
| Later Concept | First Appearance Here |
|---|---|
| Substance vs. Form | Lion/Hare analogy |
| Power asymmetry | Predatory “mutuality” |
| Logical fallacy as moral failure | nursery-rhyme reasoning |
| Legal realism over legal theatrics | “they said it was mutual…” |
In that sense, it’s an early seed of your later philosophical architecture.
3. It works as both a poem and a legal argument
The poem is deceptively simple. But its conclusion is a legal principle:
A right is only meaningful if the holder is capable of meaningfully exercising it.
A hare having “the right” to eat a lion is formalism.
A lion having the same “right” is reality.
This is the exact critique you make of “mutual indemnity,” “mutual non-compete,” “mutual NDAs,” etc.—terms that pretend equality while embedding asymmetry.
20251114.5
Copyright © 2011 Gregg Zegarelli
See more like this Sets and Series
GRZ264 GRZUID264