Stockdale Fighter Pilot

Reflections on Thoughts of a Philosophical Fighter Pilot – On Leadership – Abridgment Series

Following is an abridged excerpt from Thoughts of a Philosophical Fighter Pilot, by the late Vice Admiral James B. Stockdale.

Adm. Stockdale is a true American hero, exemplifying exceptional human virtue and leadership character. He was awarded the Medal of Honor. He was a senior research fellow at the Hoover Institution. In 1992, he was the Vice Presidential candidate with H. Ross Perot. He served in the Navy from 1947 to 1979, beginning as a test pilot and instructor at Patuxent River, Maryland, and spending two years as a graduate student at Stanford University.

During his military service, Adm. Stockdale became a fighter pilot and was shot down on his second combat tour over North Vietnam. He was held as a prisoner of war for eight years, spending four years in solitary confinement. The highest-ranking naval officer held during the Vietnam War, he was tortured fifteen times and put in leg irons for two years. At one point, he had a body weight of 50 lbs. But, yet, he survived and grew from the experience.

When Adm. Stockdale returned from captivity, he was often asked to speak about his horrific experiences in order to help others in leadership, managing life events and finding the power of virtue in self. The referenced work is a collection of his many speeches.

The use of the term “Philosophical Fighter Pilot” is intended to be in the nature of an oxymoron; to wit: a fighter pilot is the epitome of a human war mechanism. A fighter pilot is a highly detailed human machine trained to make decisions regarding some of the most complex and sophisticated weaponry. Fighter pilots are smart, decisive, and intellectually mechanized. Philosophers, on the other hand, are perceived to be high-minded, theoretical and impractical. Thus, the superficial contradiction.

But, as Adm. Stockdale implies, pushing buttons on a fighter jet is one thing, but surviving through a context of human psychological adversities is quite another thing. Strength of human character and virtue are the air-space of philosophy.


Adm. Stockdale says:

I would like to share my views with you.

But let me make one point first. I think these criteria are important because our changing times demand the kind of person who can lead in troubled times. Down the road, locating these [leaders] will be crucial to the welfare of all sectors of our society.

I’m not talking about our “nominal” leaders who may look the part, who say the right things, who indeed may be the right people in calm waters. I’m talking about the leaders who, to use Melville’s phrase, “in time of peril” come out of nowhere to control the flow of events: the businessman who rises to the top to keep a company afloat during a depression; the warrior who takes command of a decimated battalion, rallies its spirit, and makes it whole again; the mayor who gets the bankrupt city back on its feet.

Frequently, these are not the people the public was acclaiming before the fire started. These are the natural leaders to whom others instinctively turn in times of crisis, who become the leaders through trial by fire.

What are the true qualities we’re looking for [in leaders]?

Let me examine just five.

1. Must Be a Moralist. First, in order to lead under duress, one must be a moralist. By that, I don’t mean being a poseur, one who sententiously exhorts his comrades to be good. I mean he must be a thinker. He must have the wisdom, the courage, indeed the audacity to make clear just what, under the circumstances, the good is. This requires a clear perception of right and wrong and the integrity to stand behind one’s assessment. The surest way for a leader to wind up in the ash can of history is to have a reputation for indirectness or deceit. A disciplined life will encourage commitment to a personal code of conduct.

2. Must Be a Writer of Law. Second, there are times when leaders must be jurists, when their decisions must be based solely on their own ideas of fairness. In effect, they will be writing “law.” When they’re on the hot seat, they’ll need the courage to withstand the inclination to duck a problem. Many of their laws will necessarily be unpopular, but they must never be unjust. Cool, glib, cerebral, detached guys can get by in positions of authority until the pressure is on. Then people ease away from them and cling to those they know they can trust-those who can mete out just punishment and look their charges in the eye as they do it. When the chips are down, the man with the heart, not the soft heart, not the bleeding heart, but the Old Testament heart of wisdom, the hard heart, comes into his own.

3. Must Be a Teacher. Third, every good leader is a good teacher. He is able to give those around him a sense of perspective and to set the moral, social, and particularly the motivational climate among his followers. This is not an easy task. It takes wisdom and self-discipline; it requires the sensitivity to perceive philosophic disarray in one’s charges and the knowledge of how to put things in order. I believe that a good starting point is that old injunction “know thyself.” A leader must aspire to strength, compassion, and conviction several orders greater than required by society in general.

4. Must Be A Steward. Fourth, a leader must remember that he is responsible for his charges. He must tend the flock, not only cracking the whip but “washing their feet” when they are in need of help. Leadership takes compassion. It requires knowledge and character and heart to boost others up and show them the way. The Civil War historian Douglas Southall Freeman described his formula for stewardship when he said you have to know your stuff, to be a man, and to take care of your men.

5. Must Be a Philosopher. A fifth requirement of a good leader is a philosophical outlook. At least he should understand and be able to compassionately explain, when necessary, that there is no evidence that the way of the world assures the punishment of evil or the reward of virtue. The leader gives forethought to coping with undeserved reverses.

As he is expected to handle fear with courage, so also is he expected to handle calamity with emotional stability or—as Plato might say—with endurance of the soul.

Humans seem to have an inborn need to believe that virtue will be rewarded and evil punished. Often, when they come face to face with the fact that this is not always so, they are crushed.

The only way I know to handle failure is to gain historical perspective, to think about people who have successfully lived with failure.

A verse from the Book of Ecclesiastes perfectly describes the world to which I returned from prison: “I returned and saw that the race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise nor riches to men of understanding, nor favors to men of skill, but time and chance happeneth to them all.

~~ Adm. Stockdale

__________________________________

Admiral Stockdale concludes the truth and sets the expectation that unfairness and injustice are part of life. And, it is through the context of these adversities—these onslaughts to self—that we must persevere. Certain words and concepts recur, such as, “wisdom,” “courage,” “fairness,” “discipline,” and sacrificial service. This mechanized fighter pilot focuses leadership not in task management, but in the holistic Socrates Cardinal Virtues; that is, a framework of a human being’s existence. He mentions philosophy, history, Book of Ecclesiastes, moralism and stewardship.

Adm. Stockdale makes it clear that the characteristics of a leader are not trade skills, but a framework of thought and developed personal character.

Trade skills may be likened to train payloads, but it is the train rails are likened to leadership character. Once the rails of virtue and character are properly laid down, the cars can carry any load.  But, even the best of cars, carrying the best of payload commodities, cannot achieve a delivery to a proper location without the proper underlying framework.

Wisdom, virtue and character are separate and distinct from intelligence, and the earning of a trade income is no part of Admiral Stockdale’s assessment of excellence in human character and virtue.



[MUID116X]

Copyright © 2016 Gregg Zegarelli. Gregg can be contacted through LinkedIn.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/reflections-thoughts-philosophical-fighter-pilot-gregg-zegarelli-esq-

See Article Index

___________________________________________

You might also like:

Failing to Die Is Killing Us, or Logan’s Run Revisited – Stand for America®

Whom the Gods Would Destroy, They First Tease with Political Incorrectness

The Flesh is Weak, Or Why Jesus Got It Wrong

The Toll on Character

Salt, Wounds, and the Most Unkindest Cuts of All

___________________________________________

GRZ27 GRZUID27X

<< Back to prior Abridgment Series [#GRZ_20]Forward to next Abridgment Series [#GRZ_30] >>